11/13/2022 0 Comments Christina aguilera cd coversWhen the record was finally released in early 1968, the band’s record label decided to invert the front and inner artwork out of fear of being sued. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band for the album cover.Īfter spending thousands on the photo shoot, and even recruiting Jimi Hendrix to take part, Zappa ran it by Paul McCartney, who seemed fine with it, but explained it was a matter for the record label, who weren’t pleased. With themes that satirised the hippie movement, the band decided to parody The Beatles’ Sgt. The Mothers Of Invention – We’re Only In it For The Money (1968)įrank Zappa’s The Mothers Of Invention were gearing up to release their third album, We’re Only In it For The Money, in 1967 when record labels intervened. Sadly, retailers believed this cover to be somewhat ‘obscene’, and alternative versions were quickly released featuring messages that promoted singles from the record instead. When The Mamas & The Papas released their debut record, If You Can Believe Your Eyes And Ears, in 1966, the cover image featured the band sitting in a bathtub adjacent to a toilet. As you’d probably expect, almost a decade later, the general public would’ve been used to such outrageous scenes, right? Wrong. The Mamas And The Papas – If You Can Believe Your Eyes And Ears (1966)īack in 1957, Leave It To Beaver gained notoriety for becoming one of the first television programs to show a bathroom. While it wasn’t exactly the best Photoshop job we’ve seen, we have to give them kudos for producing one of the most unintentionally hilarious album covers of all time. To combat this, censors decided to make sure that Christina Aguilera was adorned with a black top, along with one of the most questionable fashion choices some sort of denim dress. As you could imagine, this caused problems for censors in Saudi Arabia. Released during her somewhat rebellious period, Aguilera’s fourth album, Stripped, featured the singer wearing little more than a pair of jeans. If you thought Nirvana’s censorship in Saudi Arabia was a bit wild, then spare a thought for poor Christina Aguilera. Sadly, censors in Saudi Arabia took issue with the cover’s image of a Transparent Anatomical Manikin, and decided to make the image a bit more modest by covering it up with a black marker. However, you might not have expected that this rule extends to matters of advertising, art, and music as well.īack in 1993, Nirvana were a global smash in the alt-rock scene, and their final album In Utero was in high demand around the world. If you’re not aware of the rules over in Saudi Arabia, women are required to cover up their faces and bodies in public. While there’s talk that frontman Julian Casablancas wanted the revised cover to be the final artwork anyway, Colin Lane’s image was already at the printers, and remains something of an international exclusive to this day. In North America though, the band feared that a group of conservative retailers might protest the album’s cover, and decided to change it to a photograph of subatomic particle tracks in a bubble chamber. Taken by photographer Colin Lane, who said he was “just trying to take a sexy picture” of his girlfriend, the album cover would well and truly help this young band turn heads everywhere they went. When The Strokes’ debut record was released in 2001, it was adorned by one of the 21st century’s most iconic album covers. The Strokes controversial Is This It (2001) How, you ask? Well, since Blink-182 were “in no way a medical organisation”, they were told they weren’t allowed to use the Red Cross’ logo on the nurse’s cap without it being a crime against humanity. Recruiting porn star Janine Lindemulder to dress in a nurse uniform for the cover, the band were soon advised their album artwork was in violation of the Geneva Convention. Blink-182’s controversial Enema Of The State (1999)īlink-182 had already attracted controversy early in their career by being forced to add the ‘182’ suffix as a result of legal action, but the album cover for 1999’s Enema Of The State was truly something else. If you don’t see your favourite controversial cover here, don’t worry, this certainly won’t be the last time we take a look back at some of these infamous record sleeves. They might be offensive, or they might be in poor taste, but above all, they certainly displeased someone with a bit of power. With that in mind, we’ve decided to take a look back through our eclectic record collections and dust off some of the records whose covers have alternative versions thanks to the powers that be.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |